Mike McConnell ‘celebrates’ three year anniversary at WGN while missing in action

mike-mcconnellToday marks the three year anniversary of Mike McConnell’s Chicago radio debut on WGN-AM 720. There won’t be any celebration or acknowledgement however because he won’t be on the air.

McConnell has been off the air since early last week, and everyday so far this week. Scheduled to fill in for him again today is the husband-and-wife duo Bob Sirott and Marianne Murciano from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., and Steve Cochran from 12 to 3 p.m. (which has been the primary substitute arrangement during his absence). The station’s website notes that McConnell will also be off on Monday.

The last post on McConnell’s Facebook page was July 31, indicating he would be on “vacation for a few days.” Since then, many of his fans have commented with concern on the possibility that he will not be coming back. Radio hosts taking a one or two week vacation isn’t abnormal. Such length of absences typically shouldn’t be used as reason to speculate that a vacationing host is on the way out.

In this case the uncertainly may be just. Larz at ChicagolandRadioandMedia.com has hinted that WGN will soon have a schedule overhaul that likely will not include McConnell. His more serious “news of the day” format seems to conflict with how the rest of the station sounds. While the exact length of his mutli-year contract was never made public, it has been speculated to be somewhere between three to five years. In the three years since his debut, his ratings have often been the anchor weighing down the rest of the station’s daypart (though McConnell isn’t the sole blame since other talent surrounding him have also earned low numbers; also not helping is bad Cubs baseball).

With the pending debut of Sirott and Murciano as full-time hosts, it would seem, at the very least, that McConnell’s current shift will be shortened. Cochran is the wildcard, not knowing what the station’s long-term plans are for him. I don’t believe for a second that he left his 560 The Answer/WIND-AM show to only work part-time at WGN. I think he will eventually land during middays, even if that doesn’t happen simultaneously whenever Sirott and Murciano officially debut their new weekday show. Whether he winds up in middays or not, I hold out hope that the real long-term plan for Cochran is to replace Jonathon Brandmeier as morning host.

Though I typically enjoy the more serious news/talk format, McConnell isn’t my favorite host, primarily because I find some of his topics to be a little too boring or not that relevant. I certainly don’t harbor the same hostility towards him that his many critics do. I just happen to enjoy the style and topics from a John Williams (former WGN host, now at WCCO-AM 830 in Minneapolis) or Paul Lisnek (“Politics Tonight” host on CLTV and regular WGN-AM fill-in).

Prior to arriving at WGN, McConnell was a 25 year veteran host in Cincinnati, having worked at WLW-AM 700. Initially, McConnell’s WLW colleague Bill Cunningham was slated to come to Chicago with him, where the two would work back-to-back shows during the midday. Cunningham changed his mind and opted to stay at WLW.

Until McConnell does return, his fans will continue to speculate his future while his critics hope he’s busy packing up his Chicago residence, en route to a permanent move back to Cincinnati.

UPDATE MONDAY 8/12/13 at 5:54 a.m.
Adding fuel to the “where is Mike McConnell?” or the “Mike McConnell fired from WGN” speculation is this week’s program schedule now posted on the WGN website. McConnell is off again all week with various hosts filling in. Also worth noting is even though Bob Sirott and Marianne Murciano are not scheduled to fill-in this week, they noted this past Friday that they would be on again next week (though no time was mentioned). What does that mean for McConnell?

His name is on the website still, and there are vague references to him mentioned on the air, but just barely.

Newspapers await for an iTunes or Netflix model of their own

Farhad Manjoo wrote an excellent column for Slate explaining how Amazon.com CEO Jeff Blezo’s influence on e-commerce and marketing has been so innovative and how that might be relevant to the Washington Post.

Manjoo’s explains how the inexpensive information — and not necessarily the hard news — inside a newspaper played a huge role in attracting readers, and how the Internet curtailed that strategy.

For decades, newspapers made money by bundling two distinct kinds of data: low-cost information and high-cost news. The information—classifieds, stocks, sports scores, weather, entertainment listings, recipes, horoscopes, coupons, police blotters, obits—was widely popular and cheap and easy to produce.

… newspapers worked as a business, because they had a monopoly on the low-cost information. As long as there was no other place for their audience to go to for classifieds and all the rest, readers and advertisers kept paying for the ink, indirectly subsidizing the serious stuff.

Another column worth reading is by Cade Metz at Wired, about how Bezos’ Post purchase will likely tie with Amazon.

Metz also points out that high-cost news has not its own game-changing revolution the way music had via iTunes or movies via Netflix. Both iTunes and Netflix took existing products/services people already paid for and created a new model for them to receive the same but at less expense. Meanwhile, the best newspapers have come up with so far are paywalls behind their websites or mobile apps. Asides from the major publications, there’s no guarantee that model will work.

The thought of paying for online news is beyond outrageous among the young people today. You have the same problem, to a lesser extent, with music and movies, but the situation is a night and day difference because while newspapers have given their content away for free online for well over a decade, music and movies have not readily been available online for free. The workaround of downloading via BitTorrent (or previously with Napster) is illegal.

After a full day to think about it, the general consensus is that Bezos will somehow attempt to incorporate the Posts’s news content into the Amazon universe. And if Bezos is able to garner any type of success, it won’t be long before other tech giants, such as Google or Facebook, follow.

Will Jeff Bezos redefine the new normal for modern journalism?

wa-po-sold

There’s plenty of buzz coming from yesterday’s shocker that Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos is purchasing the Washington Post. Obviously, the Post website has a lot of great content and reaction from various writers regarding the sale. Politico also has a variety of content worth checking out.

Dylan Byers has an excellent round-up of the purchase, what it potentially means down the road and more. Mad props as well for the headline “Bezos adds Washington Post to cart” (note, the headline has since been changed to “Jeff Bezos re-Kindles hope at The Washington Post” — still cute, but I like the original better).

I’m looking forward to observing how the Post evolves in the coming years, after enough time has passed for Bezos to implement his ideas and strategy. The looming question concerning newspapers is profitability and how to monetize the online and mobile app presence in order to pay for the high cost of journalism.

The last great hope is that someone like Bezos, a highly successful and innovate entrepreneur, and an outsider to the industry, can instill new ideas that result in a new money making model that other newspapers or news producing organizations may possibly borrow.

The demand for straight news on all mediums remains highly uncertain, as the soon to debut cable network Al Jazeera America is likely to soon find out. Can a news producing organization by itself be profitable? Before cable television, the respective news divisions at ABC, NBC and CBS were money losers that were primarily subsidized from the revenues generated from each network’s line of soap opera programming. I think something like that almost has to happen again, in a more modern sense of course.

Sam Zell’s purchase of the Tribine Company was the textbook example on how to turn a bad situation at a newspaper into a worse one. The combination of personal greed and unrealistic expectations curbed any chance Zell had from day one. I like to believe that Bezos is Zell’s opposite. I’m more willing to give him the benefit of the doubt  (as opposed to someone like Boston Red Sox owner John Henry, who is now eying to purchase the Boston Globe).

While we don’t yet know what Bezos’ expectations are for the Post, it might help if our expectations for Bezos remain in check. Running a news producing organization, such as one as large and influential as the Post, is quite the unproven endeavor in today’s modern world of journalism.

If Bezos turns out not to be the miracle man journalism has been waiting for, I have no doubts, it won’t be due to a lack of honest effort.

ESPN 1000 sinks further beneath the Score

wmvp-studioOn Friday, news broke that John Jurkovic, veteran host at WMVP-AM/ESPN 1000, was resigned to a multi-year renewal. This is the latest of moves made by the station plagued with years of downward ratings.

The impetus for ESPN 1000’s ratings woes by and large came in Jan. 2009 with the sudden exit of superstar host Dan McNeil, who months later would resurface on WSCR-AM/670 The Score. McNeil’s ESPN 1000 exit was a self-inflicted wound since it was Jim Pastor, the station’s then general manager, who gave him the boot.

McNeil’s former afternoon co-hosts Harry Teinowitz and Jurkovic were joined by Carmen DeFalo to help steer the ship, while Tom Waddle and Marc Silverman would continue to hold the fort during middays. Since then, it seemed to be a matter of when, not if, the “Waddle and Silvy” show would eventually move to afternoons.

Months turned into years, while ratings fell deeper, further distancing themselves from the Score.

In March, and a little more than four years following the station’s last significant programming change, ESPN 1000 was ready for change. Gone was Teinowitz, leaving DeFalco and Jurkovic the remaining two hosts in afternoons. In April, the station pulled the trigger on moving “Waddle and Silvy” to afternoons while “Carmen and Jurko” moved to middays (but not after also renewing DeFalco’s contract). A few other programming tweaks made room during the 9 a.m. hour for Colin Cowherd’s nationally syndicated ESPN Radio show, “The Herd.”

The station was quick to tout themselves as the “all new ESPN 1000.”

Ugh, perhaps, more like a fresh coat of paint?

While I don’t think the swapping of the “Carmen and Jurko” and” Waddle and Silvy” shows will mean much in the long-run, there are a few justifications for at least trying.

  1. Waddle and Silvy’s continued relationship with Bears quarterback Jay Cutler. With Cutler appearing as a weekly guest during Bears season, afternoons may allow for added exposure. This may hold more weight if the appearances take place as sponsored remotes, in which more people may be able to attend after their work day.
  2. Even though the Score’s “Boers and Bernstein” show is doing very well in the ratings, a lot of people don’t like the awkward, brash, silly and tension that often accompanies the show. Those not liking B&B who previously may not have warmed up to “Carmen and Jurko” may potentially warm up to “Waddle and Silvy.” This, however, is dicey because the many who can’t stand B&B still listen anyways (which is the same reason why people read Jay Mariotti in the Chicago Sun-Times each day).

Another glaring hole in the programming department is the “ESPN 1000 Post Game Show.” Featuring noteworthy segments from the day’s “Waddle and Silvy” and “Carmen and Jurko” shows, the 6 p.m. hour is more or less a throwaway. Since the station continues local programming on most weeknights from 7 to 10 p.m., would it hurt to eliminate the “Post Game Show” and offer an additional hour of live programming, preferably with Jonathan Hood?

I would like for ESPN 1000 to put up more of a fight. I’ve been listening on and off to AM 1000 since the mid 1990s (dating prior to the ESPN Radio takeover in 1998). I’ve also had the privilege of meeting some of their personalities through the years. Personal bias aside, I admit that my ESPN 1000 listening has decreased in sync with other Chicago sports fans who now get most of their sports talk from the Score.

Four months after the swapping of the “Carmen and Jurko” and “Waddle and Silvy” shows, ratings appear to be stagnant. And with Teinowitz’s firing in March, he so far is the lone scapegoat for the station’s ratings woes.

For all we know, overtaking the Score may not be the ultimate goal for ESPN 1000 management, or that of ESPN Radio corporate in Bristol, CT. As long as revenues meet expectations, they just might be content with second place.

On the surface, that appears to be the playbook they are abiding by.

Ranting about CBS 2 News and television’s overuse of live reports

There are plenty of times when being live and on scene where news is happening or recently happened greatly enhances the ability to tell a story. The camera can capture visuals while the reporter gathers information by talking to news makers face-to-face (i.e. police, witnesses, etc.).

Then there are other times when being live on location does nothing to enhance the broadcast. Unfortunately, this happens more often than is necessary in television news, both locally and nationally. At some point in time, some research must have concluded that viewers are more interested in a story when live and on scene at a given location where news has happened or soon will.

A perfect example is right now on the WBBM-TV/CBS 2 morning news  broadcast, where reporter Susanna Song is reporting live in front of U.S. Cellular Field all morning to report on the anticipation of star Yankee third baseman Alex Rodriguez possibly playing in tonight’s game against the White Sox. Of course, the spotlight is on Rodriguez due to his impending suspension that is expected to be announced today due to his alleged use of PEDs.

There is nothing more ridiculous than a news reporter standing in front of an empty baseball stadium at 4:50 in the morning to report on a story when none of the potential news makers (i.e. Rodriguez, Yankee Manager Joe Girardi, teammates, MLB Commissioner Bud Selig, etc.) are going to be on hand. The visual of a dark U.S. Cellular Field at 4:50 in the morning also doesn’t provide any valuable visuals that enhances the broadcast. Nor will it make much difference at 6:50 after the sun has risen.

There is no reason for Song to be in front of U.S. Cellular Field at this time. There’s no reason why the story even has to be live. I didn’t watch last night’s CBS 2 newscast, but I’m willing to bet that the assigned sports anchor had likely mentioned a thing or two about Rodriguez . Wouldn’t it have been more efficient for that anchor to have filed a one or two minute report in studio to be played during this morning’s newscast? Or, why not just keep Song in studio where she can deliver the same report as she did in front of the ballpark, or perhaps send her to report on a more newsworthy story while allowing one of the in-studio anchors to mention Rodriguez?

Many of these questions are rhetorical, of course.

Beyond the ridiculousness of Song being live at the ballpark, this story also is CBS 2’s top story at the start of this 5 a.m. broadcast (after first beginning with traffic and weather)! While our current news cycle involves a heightened alert for potential terrorist activity, abundance Chicago gun violence, and record setting attendance at this weekend’s Lollapalooza, CBS 2 thinks the most important story of the day is Rodriguez!?

Ughhh.

A few other notes and observations from this morning’s newscast…

– Marissa Bailey and Roseanne Tellez are anchoring this morning’s newscast while Kris Gutierrez is absent. Though there was no mention of him at the start of the 5 a.m. broadcast, I assume Gutierrez is simply enjoying the day off (the CBS 2 staff did celebrate his birthday with him on Friday).

– Speaking of Bailey and Tellez, both have been rotating morning anchor duties since the station’s dismissal of Susan Carlson in May. Bailey has typically anchored Monday and Tuesdays (on top of her weekend morning anchoring duties) while Tellez has been anchoring Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays. When exactly does CBS 2 plan on hiring a permanent replacement for Carlson?

While I think either Bailey or Tellez are fine choices, CBS 2 should pick one of them already to go all five days for the sake of consistency. Then again, CBS 2 may not want viewers to get use to one person in anticipation of eventually hiring an outsider.

– With Derrick Young off again today, meteorologist Megan Glaros is holding down the fort doing both weather and traffic.Was this a planned scheduling, or did someone forget to schedule a substitute? Somewhat of an odd occurrence considering CBS 2 had scheduled meteorologist Ed Curan to fill in on traffic last week.

– Young will be back on traffic for tomorrow’s broadcast.

– Speaking of Carlson, it amazes me at the amount of traffic her dismissal still brings to this website. Going on three months since her exit from CBS 2, the Google search queries for her have barely tapered since. After a few weeks off the grid, Carlson is keeping plenty busy as afternoon news anchor for the “Roe & Roeper” show on WLS-AM 890 and as a reporter for the WMAQ-TV/NBC 5 weekend news.

Sirott and Murciano warming up for soon to be full-time work at WGN

Bob Sirott and Marianne Murciano, the soon to be full-time WGN-AM 720 hosts, are warming up the pipes in anticipation for their eventual debut to weekdays. As for now, they are simply filling in for the vacationing Mike McConnell. The couple filled in yesterday from 12  to 3 p.m. and will be on again tomorrow and Monday from 10 a.m. to noon.

Though WGN President and General Manager Jimmy de Castro acknowledged the couple’s hiring to Chicago media journalist Robert Feder, no official start day or time slot has been announced.

Larz at ChicagolandRadioandMedia.com has repeatedly hinted that McConnell, who now holds down the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. slot (while the 2 p.m. hour is occupied by various part-time hosts) is likely on his way out in the coming weeks, leaving the entire 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. time up for grabs. Sirott and Murciano would likely inherit a two or three hour show within those hours while the remaining time could go to either Bill Leff, the station’s overnight host, or Steve Cochran, who recently returned to the station as a fill-in host.

Sunday night host Brian Noonan, who has been deemed a rising star, recently announced that he had accepted a full-time job outside of radio, thus eliminating him as potential replacement for middays.

At this time, the only sure thing is that Sirott and Murciano will soon be heard five days a week on WGN. Anything outside of that is simply rumor or speculation. For all we know, de Castro may have a few more aces up his sleeve, leaving the potential for this to play out completely different.

Though not rock bottom, the ‘Big 89’ WLS has fallen far from prominence

Plenty of chatter has been devoted to the pending exits of both Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity from the 40 or so Cumulus-owned news/talk stations they currently have shows broadcasting on. Locally, such a move would obviously have a significant impact on WLS-AM 890’s program schedule (Limbaugh 11 a.m. – 2 p.m.,  Hannity via tape delay 6-9 p.m.).

Further dents in the WLS program schedule is the last thing that station needs right now.

The current trainwreck at WLS was something I was meaning to bring up here, however, there was some good discussion about the station in recent days on the ChicagolandRadioandMedia.com message board.

There’s no question that WLS had a few rough months with the sudden death of midday host Jake Hartford and the exit of morning hosts Don Wade & Roma. Not helping was the reassignment of Drew Hayes (station’s operation director) to KABC-AM in Los Angeles. However, the rough patch the station had was near the end of 2012 and beginning of 2013. We’re on the eve of August and WLS is merely treading water with hands tied behind its back.

Personally, I’m not a fan of the new morning show with Bruce Wolf and Dan Proft. At least Don Wade or even someone like Jerry Agar (early midday host in 2008 and 2009, now early midday host at NewsTalk 1010/CFRB-AM in Toronto) understood radio and had an art for creating compelling discussion, even if you didn’t agree with them. Proft doesn’t come close. Instead he preaches, except when he is awkwardly tiptoeing around Wolf.

I have not listened to enough of John Kass and Lauren Cohn, the station’s early midday hosts, to have an honest opinion. Many people on the CRM board have written that Kass personifies the old  adage “a voice for print” (not sure if that is really an adage… if not, then I’m making it up). Kass often writes compelling content in his Chicago Tribune column, but from the little I have heard, it doesn’t carry over on the air while he is host.

I’ve been a listener of Roe Conn since the late 1990s when he was paired with Garry Meier. Conn’s show has had ups and downs through the years, depending on who he’s been partnered or sidekicked with. The current arrangement with Richard Roeper is not my favorite. Not sure if Roeper is the problem or if I grew tired of the Jim Johnson (now retired) and Christina Filliagi act. I’ve also been a victim of bad luck when attempting to listen to their show. I’ll say eight out of 10 times when trying, I hear commercials. The commercial breaks are long and often. Not helping is the ridiculous “Traffic & Weather – First on the Fives,” which after more than a year, are still prominently unsponsored (!).

The commercial content and repetitive traffic problems apply to the station’s morning and early midday shows as well.

I have a hard time getting past Conn’s continued stammering while telling a story. He often comes across as one with severe ADHD while telling a story and becoming distracted, either by someone else in studio or because a new thought popped into his head. I can put that aside because Conn is highly intelligent and has a fairly realistic point of view when it comes to analyzing the relevant news of the day.

The morning and early midday shows are incredibly dull and the chemistry during the afternoon show just doesn’t click with me.

As bad as it is at WLS, it could be a lot worse. Cumulus, the number two largest radio ownership in the country (which includes WLS), could have cancelled much of the local programming many months ago and had replaced it with syndicated crap. To their credit, they’ve resisted so far.

While things there could be a lot worse, they also could be a lot better. It’s a shame that no one else there seemingly thinks so.

The cat’s meow

A lot of people had a good laugh yesterday courtesy of the ChicagoTribune.com’s home page gaffe featuring the cat and “Headline test here” heading. This was the second highly publicized embarrassment for the Tribune in the last week and a half.

The Sunday (7/21) Tribune’s front page featured a story that later turned out to be highly falsified (as noted in this past Sunday’s paper).

As for yesterday’s mishap, classify that as one hell of a web exclusive. Those who still only read the paper missed out on that one.

Who says the Trib isn’t committed to digital?

Art Bell ‘Sirius’ about return to radio; satellite makes sense

It was only a few short months ago I wrote that Art Bell needs to stop steering his fans on a bumpy ride. His semi-frequent vague teases (via Facebook) always led to nowhere, leaving his many fans disappointed.

That all changed today with the announcement via ArtBell.com that the legendary overnight talk show host is launching a new radio show this September on SiriusXM,

Some of his fans will surely be disappointed that he is on satellite, which for at least $15 per month is not exactly cheap . At the end of the day however, satellite is more likely to give Bell everything he wants. He’s certainly entitled.

Bell has previously noted that the high amount of commercial content on the current “Coast to Coast AM” bothered him. On SiriusXM, commercials are limited.

Bell can be uncensored and seemingly no topic would be barred from discussion. Not sure how important that is to him, but such parameters mean Bell should have little restraints, if any. The minimal restraints, I’m guessing, is important to him. He will have a lot of freedom.

Even though Bell made a lot of money in his prime radio days, he’s going to make plenty more, further ensuring the long-term financial security of his family.

The limited commercials and the added freedom are two parameters Bell could have gotten if he had gone the podcast route. However, the guaranteed income would likely be less than what SiriusXM can offer. At the end of the day, Bell has every right to make as much money as he can.

And SiriusXM will still receive a hefty handful of new subscribers because of it.

Back on the media scene, with a new name and philosophy

So, once upon a time, I started my own media blog. With the abundant of media news, gossip and randon tidbits that seem to constantly surface, I made an attempt to stay on top of it as much as possible, getting to the point that my head spinned right off my neck. I crashed and burned and eventually stopped blogging.

My mistake.

As a full-time graphic designer and webmaster, I can’t be a full-time media blogger. I knew that originally, but I still somehow forgot that in my first attempt, and it just didn’t work.

This go-round, I’m hoping to apply a new philosophy. Take it slow and easy. No pressure. Only write when I truly have something worth writing about. That’s my hope at least.

With a new philosophy also comes a name change. Prior to launching this blog, I had a few name ideas and fielded them around with friends and family. I was always sold on “Blowtorch Press,” but almost everyone else liked “Media Blowtorch,” and that’s what I went with. Being away from this for a while, and having thought about it from a fresh mindset, I probably should have gone with what I initially liked.

And now I am. The new name of this blog is the Blowtorch Press, conveniently located at www.blowtorchpress.com.

With the new change and philosophy, I’m more comfortable with this attempt.

I’m not a media professional or insider. I’m simply an enthused media geek who has a lot to say.

And I hope it will be worth your time