Hiring back Keith Olbermann, ESPN attempts to one-up Fox Sports 1 network launch

While I won’t say ESPN is necessarily losing sleep over next month’s launch of Fox Sports 1, I think it’s safe to say the network isn’t taking any chance.

ESPN’s hiring of Keith Olbermann should be a strong indicator of that. Two other aspects further clarify that ESPN may, in fact, actually be sweating (if only just a little).

1. ESPN is allowing Olbermann time of in October so that he can anchor MLB post-season coverage for TBS. This, I find the most surprising. After one month on the air (and hopefully after viewers have developed a new habit of watching), the new show and host go on hiatus so he can bring attention to another network outside the Disney/ESPN corporate family.

Why doesn’t ESPN just wait until after the MLB post-season to debut him and avoid the awkward hiatus?

2. ESPN doesn’t normally hire back former on air talents. ESPN President John Skipper in March even backed that up when saying “… this is not an easy place to get back into. There are not that many successful examples of people who have come back, in part because it’s like water filling a vacuum. When somebody leaves, somebody else fills their place.”

I do hope this works. I find Olbermann to be a fascinating on air talent, and I’m looking forward to hopefully having another television option for 10 p.m. (even though I don’t normally watch television at 10 p.m. — but just in case I ever decide to).

And when news hits of the first Olbermann blowup a few weeks or months after returning to ESPN, you can look forward to an interesting story. And a few months later, an interesting story on why he’s no longer there.

Just being realistic.

Related Reading: Jeff Bercovici wrote a piece at Forbes.com on how Olbermann needs to take advantage of this opportunity by not being… Olbermann. I could have read this same column last year just before he made his debut at Current TV.

Sirott and Murciano joining WGN Radio full-time; plenty of options for how to fit them in

News broke yesterday that Chicago news veteran Bob Sirott is joining WGN-AM 720 full-time, with his wife (and former Fox 32/WFLD-TV “Fox Thing in the Morning” co-anchor) Marianne Murciano. The two are expected to host either a midday or an afternoon show, beginning in the next few weeks.

While the addition of Sirott and Murciano personally doesn’t have me that excited, I am happy that the new station management is making a bold effort to greatly improve the station (which is a far contrast from six, seven months ago following the departure of John Williams). Considering Sirott is still a full-time news anchor (at WFLD/Fox Chicago, at least for now), and based on previous talk shows they have done together, I see the possibility for a rather vanilla type of show by avoiding the more interesting and relevant political or social discussions. I hope they aren’t going to play it too safe.

With the recent departures of Carol Roth (12 – 1 p.m., Mon-Fri) and Turi Ryder (10 p.m. – 1 a.m., Mon-Thurs), the station’s schedule currently has Jonathon Brandmeier on from 6 to 10 a.m., Mike McConnell from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., Garry Meier from 3 to 7 p.m. and David Kaplan and friends from 7 p.m. to midnight. To fit Sirott and Murciano into the lineup, WGN has a few options. They can shorten McConnell’s show, and schedule them to begin at either 12 or 1 p.m, and go until 3. I don’t see anything later in the day as a realistic option. I just can’t see the station removing Meier from afternoon drive at this point.

Other rumors, as hinted by Larz at ChicagolandRadioandMedia.com, suggest McConnell could be out in the coming weeks, which would leave a large void in the schedule. If McConnell indeed does leave, it would make sense for Sirott and Murciano to occupy a portion of his current on air time, though not all five hours. The station may be planning to fill the remaining void with either Steve Cochran (who filled in last week and this week for Brandmeier) or Brian Noonan (currently hosts Sunday evenings and was recently removed from the evening sports show he co-hosted with Kaplan).

Cochran was a long time fan favorite at the station, so him returning full-time in some capacity would make a lot of sense. On the other hand, Noonan is also well liked and can be considered a rising star who rightfully deserves a daytime slot.

Ideally, what I would like to see is for WGN to fit both guys in by removing both McConnell and Brandmeier. Cochran while filling in for Brandmeier these last few days has sounded so good and natural, while Brandmeier seems out of place and out of touch with the times. A day-time lineup with Cochran in the morning, followed by Noonan in late mornings, Sirott and Murciano in the early afternoons, followed by Meier would make for a swell lineup.

Examining the sad state of Barnes & Noble following the resignation of CEO William Lynch

The resignation of William Lynch as CEO is a big blow to Barnes & Noble. If not for the sake of his day-to-day and/or long-term presence, then at least for the sake of morale.

His appointment as CEO in 2009 and his plan to build-up the company’s digital infrastructure was rightfully acclaimed as forward thinking — the only logical phase for the company to pursue. Manufacturing a line of e-readers and tablets would provide the means for the selling of digital content for years to come. This could have allowed the company to better absorb losses coming from its brick and mortar stores and/or phase them out completely. The goal was to become a viable alternative to the likes of Amazon.

Even though the strategy looked good on paper, any long-term viable success would require that implementation goes 100% smoothly. Unfortunately, there were a few misses along the way. The limitations of the early Nook Color in 2010/2011 likely hindered potential momentum out the gate.  I also think the (fair or unfair) perception of a struggling book company making their own tablets didn’t help. At the time, any non-Apple manufactured tablet didn’t have a good rep. Budget friendly tablets didn’t really take until Google came along with their $199 seven-inch Nexus; soon followed by the Kindle Fire at the same price (the Kindle Fire came out first, but it appears that the Nexus has taken off more then the Fire).

I’m not sure if Barnes & Noble’s strategy was doomed from the start. Perhaps, some altercation to the strategy would warranted different results. At this time last year, the formation of Nook Media as a separate subsidiary with Microsoft was deemed positive. Since then, it’s hard to identify just how Microsoft has benefited from the arrangement. It’s quite puzzling that B&N never seemed to maximize the potential benefits of such an arraignment (i.e. never any real discussion of future Nook products being Windows 8 based).

Regardless why the Nook strategy bombed, I’m saddened by what appears to be a repeat of the struggle that Borders previously experienced prior to its demise in 2011. Even if the Nook strategy would have taken off, I realize B&N’s book stores would have slowly disappeared. My  hope (as naive as it may have been) was that for the sake of novelty, there would always be a few remaining stores here and there. Maybe that still happens in some capacity, though the remaining uncertainty is unsettling.

I suppose I should also mention that I am quite the hypocrite. While rooting for the success of Barnes & Noble, I am doing so while using the Kindle. Why I’m not supporting the Nook product line is a long story in itself… one that I’m sure I’ll eventually blog about.

Mitch Rosen keeping Score: Declines WGN program director job, stays at WSCR

Mitch Rosen

Mitch Rosen, program director at WSCR-AM (670 The Score)

By the end of Jimmy de Castro’s first day as president and general manager of WGN-AM 720 on Monday, Bill White had been relieved of his duties as program director while Mitch Rosen (pictured, right) was the leading candidate to replace him.

While we now know that Rosen, program director at WSCR-AM/670 The Score is not going to WGN, the waters around Tribune Tower have quickly become turbulent (quite the contrast to what I said on Sunday when suggesting de Castro would not impose immediate change).

While Rosen declining WGN is newsworthy, the decision to stay at the Score may be more prominent. It shows a tremendous amount of confidence by Rosen to both the Score and parent company CBS Radio.  With the volatility that has become so common in radio these days (and CBS Radio being no stranger to such behavior), I don’t see how Rosen declines such an opportunity without first knowing that his current position is not only secured, but that he’ll be able to continue operating with the freedom and flexibility he’s had for the better part of four years.

As a passionate radio fan, I can’t help but find myself at the edge of my seat when thinking about today’s corporate radio culture. In January, a “Secret Squirrel” post on Mike Anderson’s STLMedia.net blog noted that CBS Radio was on the verge of selling their St. Louis cluster of stations, including KMOX-AM 1120 to Cumulus Media. The very thought of that happening was enough to ruffle the feathers of those within the St. Louis radio bubble. Not helping, I’m sure, was the recently formed alliance between CBS Radio and Cumulus in the launching of the CBS Sports Radio network. If the CBS Radio/Cumulus deal happened in St. Louis (it hasn’t), what kind of ramifications might that have in other markets where CBS Radio has an abundance of stations?

As for Rosen, I had mixed emotions about him possibly taking the WGN job. With WGN and the Score being the two Chicago stations I listen to the most, I found myself wondering which station would benefit the most by having him. Rosen has proved he is capable of managing big named personalities and egos, while also having a pulse for what works in today’s radio environment.  While I hesitate to give him full credit for the Score’s modern day ratings success (I think the arrival of Dan McNeil and the leftover staleness at ESPN 1000/WMVP-AM were huge catalyst), I came to the conclusion that perhaps, Rosen has done all he could at the Score and was ready for a new challenge.

That certainly would have been justification for taking the job. Now that challenge is left for someone else.

While the search for WGN’s new program director continues, I am left with one question… does de Castro have a plan B?

For more about Mitch Rosen, I highly suggest listening to the interview he did with the “Radiogirl” Margaret Larkin from earlier this year.

What’s Old is New: Jimmy de Castro hire puts WGN through the ‘Loop’

The Tribune Company dropped a bombshell this morning by announcing the hiring of Jimmy de Castro as the new president and general manager of WGN-AM 720 in Chicago. He starts June 3.

De Castro’s vast radio and digital media background makes this a monumental move for the Tribune-owned news/talk station. The added element of awesomeness is that de Castro reunites with Tribune Broadcasting President Larry Wert — the two of them were instrumental in the operations of WLUP-FM/97.9 The Loop during the mid 1990’s. While Wert’s primary priorities are involved with the Tribune’s various television stations throughout the country, de Castro will be in charge of the day-to-day operations at WGN Radio.

De Castro also has history with current WGN morning host Jonathon Brandmeier and WGN afternoon host Garry Meier from their days at WLUP, further solidifying the Loop reunion tour. How long before someone on a message board or on Twitter insists that de Castro hiring Steve Dahl is all but imminent?

Until today, the short-term future of the station has been murky. Tribune executives, including Larry Wert himself, have carefully been vague whenever referencing WGN’s future. The de Castro hire seems to suggest there is some type of commitment from Tribune towards rebuilding the station, as opposed to immediately selling it.

That is a stark contrast from the end of last year when the company was in the final stages of its four-year bankruptcy. It was highly believed that the aggressive expense cutting then taking place at WGN was in anticipation of an eventual sale of the station. The departure of long-time Vice President and General Manager Tom Langmyer, the firing of the highly rated Milt Rosenberg, splitting the poorly rated Mike McConnell into two midday shifts and the hiring of two inexpensive talents Carol Roth and Turi Ryder were interpreted as the beginning of dark days for the station (also not helping was the departure of John Williams, who has publically stated that the decision to leave was his).

Until recently, WGN was a leading source of revenue for Tribune, even while the station struggled with internal turmoil during the Randy Michaels and Kevin Metheny era. Though station revenue has nosedived of late, hiring a radio pro like de Castro is a sure indicator that the company thinks it can turn things around.

While it remains possible that the company’s long-term plan is to rebuild the station and then sell it for top dollar, such a strategy may be risky. The purchase of the iconic New York news/talk WOR-AM last summer by Clear Channel was reportedly for $30 million.  While $30 million certainly isn’t chump change, it’s a low number compared to previous trends where such stations would have likely sold for a higher amount.

There are no guarantees when approximating the future value of WGN or any radio station. Concerning WGN, the expenses invested in rebuilding the station, whether that rebuild works or not, the downward ratings trend of the news/talk format in general, and the continued advancement of technology all make it risky to not go for the fast grab of cash now, as opposed to maybe three to five years from now.

If WGN went up for sale tomorrow, they would likely have a decent list of potential suitors – Clear Channel, Cumulus Media and/or Hubbard Broadcasting might all possibly be on that list.

I have no doubt Clear Channel would love to have a strong Chicago outlet on the AM band. At present, Clear Channel/Premiere Radio syndicated programming airs up the dial on Cumulus-owned WLS-AM 890, which is believed to soon drop all Premiere programming (i.e. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity) in place of their own syndicated programming (i.e. Mike Huckabee, Michael Savage or Geraldo Rivera). There is very little reason why Clear Channel would not want to have WGN as an option to either carry their syndicated shows or make money off some type of local talk format.

Last year, it was rumored that Cumulus was interested in purchasing WGN. That certainly was a rumor that made me shutter (concerning WGN, I’d take my chances with Clear Channel as opposed to Cumulus).

As a WGN fan, I’m excited. I hope today’s hiring is the beginning of better days. de Castro certainly will have his work cut out for him. Though I do not expect him to make any quick changes, I do hope one of his first priorities is to address the awkward midday schedule — the current schedule with Mike McConnell working the 10am-12pm and 1pm-3pm shifts must change. An upgrade to Carol Roth, now hosting the “Noon Show,” is badly needed.

The station needs to figure out what it wants to be. Right now, middays (with McConnell and Roth) is more or less a current events format, while the morning and afternoon shows are more “loose” or free spirited entertainment. WGN needs to pick a lane and implement a daytime schedule that is consistent with the format. It’s somewhat okay to break format during evenings and on weekends, but the daypart format must be consistent.

WGN Radio was given a second chance in late 2010 following the removal of Randy Michaels and Kevin Metheny. Tom Langmyer and Program Director Bill White did the absolute best they could at undoing most of the damage done by Michaels and Metheny (even with some hurdles leftover, such as McConnell’s long and expensive contract, or Sean Compton’s hiring of Brandmeier). The hard work by Langmyer and White sadly came crashing down at the end of 2012.

With Wert and de Castro now overseeing things, WGN appears to have been granted a third chance. Let’s hope the third time’s the charm.

Loud and Clear: WGN’s Jonathon Brandmeier incapable of handling serious news

Jonathon Brandmeier

Days prior to his Dec. 2011 debut as morning host at WGN-AM 720 in Chicago, Jonathon Brandmeier, in an interview with Chicago media critic Robert Feder, claimed he was capable of handling serious breaking news.

Absolutely, positively. I just absolutely can do it. I always consider myself a journalist. Ron Magers used to say, “Brandmeier will take a story and peck it apart like a chicken until he gets every feather off of it.” I feel like that’s what I do. They’ll have me and the great resources of the Tribune Company. These guys know what they’re talking about. Believe me, I know what I’m doing.

Luckily for those listening to WGN in the morning, Brandmeier hasn’t had to really handle an immediate breaking news situation — outside of a winter snowstorm or the morning after the Boston Marathon bombings (more on that later).  I listened to Brandmeier this morning to see if he would discuss, or how he would handle discussing, yesterday’s devastating tornado damage in Moore City, OK.

Brandmeier began the show with staff meteorologist Tim McGill to talk about the situation. Ignoring some of the borderline humorous side remarks or connotations coming from either Brandmeier or his sidekick Buzz Killman, I thought the conversation was decent, for Brandmeier standards.

Any positive vibes I had went out the window as soon as I heard the theme music for the Wicked Witch of the West’s character from the “Wizard of Oz.” I understand the connection and that the tornado was such an important component of that movie.  I get it.

What Brandmeier or someone on his staff apparently doesn’t get is that because that song is associated with an aloof movie character who ultimately was meant as comedic fodder, the playing of that song mocks the seriousness of the story, whether intentionally or not. This natural disaster killed or injured countless people and has shattered the lives of many more.

How appropriate was it for Brandmeier to congratulate a runner for completing the Boston Marathon — when considering how steep some of those hills are — during an interview the morning after the bombings!?

Thankfully, he wasn’t on WGN the day after Sept. 11, 2001. Is it too far fetched to imagine him asking one of the rescue firefighters “so… after learning of the attack, did you still slide down the pole while on your way out of the station?”

Memo to whoever is left running the Tribune Tower: It is high time to constrain your morning host and his staff. And if the consequence of that results in him leaving, so be it. His ratings have dropped significantly since joining the station, and if the rumors are true that he never got around to signing his contract, then what’s the hold on not upsetting him? It’s not like his leaving would cost the station that much, if anything.

More like an addition by subtraction.

CBS 2 Chicago playing musical chairs (again), Susan Carlson wrongfully on the outs

Susan CarlsonBoth Robert Feder, via Twitter, and Larz at Chicagoland Radio & Media reported yesterday that WBBM-TV/CBS 2 has released morning news anchor Susan Carlson. According to Larz, CBS 2 opted to remove Carlson from the air prior to the expiration of her contract, most likely to shake things up as the ratings for the morning newscast remain at or near rock bottom.

This move is a real shock to me. As a regular viewer of CBS 2’s morning news, Carlson was not the problem with that newscast. As a matter of fact, I have a hard time identifying any real significant problems with the newscast.

Carlson and co-anchor Kris Gutierrez were a respectable team – they worked well together, were capable of showing personality when appropriate, and did a solid job at delivering the morning’s news. The added personality coming from Meagan Glaros (weather) and Derrick Young completed the newscast, as far as on set goes. There was real chemistry.

CBS 2 has a real tendency to play musical chairs, seemingly every other year or so when their ratings don’t show improvement. Sometimes, such moves are necessary, such as when the station opted to remove Steve Bartelstein, who was not a great fit. Other times, the moves are done just for the sake of change, such as when the station decided to remove evening news anchor Anne State several years back.

And for the sake of honesty, even though I am a huge fan of State’s eventual replacement Kate Sullivan, she hasn’t been much of an upgrade. That’s not a knock on Sullivan — it just means that there was nothing wrong with State!

And there was nothing wrong with Carlson either. While there are plenty of talented female news anchors out there, it’s not a given that the new choice will do as good of a job as Carlson. And even if she does, it will be hard to find someone who does a better job than Carlson. So at best case scenario, they find someone who does as good of a job. To that, I ask, what’s the freakin point!? Besides demoralizing the rest of the morning news staff and potentially upsetting the on air chemistry, this move will do nothing to shake the ratings. At best, CBS 2 will likely find whoever they hire to replace Carlson will be nothing more then a lateral move.

Just for fun… Since CBS 2 is desperate for attention, maybe they should consider hiring recently ousted Comcast SportsNet reporer Susannah Collins.  At the very least, that would probably generate added views to their YouTube channel!

Politico’s paywall experiment poses a valuable question – at which point does the paywall model become saturated?

Following Politico’s announcement last week that the publication would begin testing a metered paywall system in a handful of states, their media writer Dylan Byers tweeted the following:

I don’t care so much about the question as I do about the idea that most websites producing original content would charge for access. Even if Byers’ tweet was tongue-and-cheek, I do wonder if such an idea could be realistic in the near future.

What kind of websites would be worth charging access for? Any journalistic entity would be an absolute must due to its high cost. Many prominent newspapers have already established a paywall system on their websites, while others such as the Washington Times soon will be.

Would it be out of line for other niche publications to charge for access, such as TMZ, the Verge of SportsbyBrooks? Or how about narrower niche sites like the Daily Kos or Android Central? At some point, the paywall system has to become saturated. I’m not sure there are enough people with disposable incomes willing to pay for all the content they now get for free.

It was much easier for publications, general and niche, to make money in the pre-Internet era. Back then, people relied on the local paper in their city or region for a mix of local, national and world news. Anyone wanting more reading content  subscribed to weekly or monthly magazines.

I’m a semi frequent visitor to Politico, primarily for Dylan Byer’s media content. Depending on what pricing structure and the amount of free access they allow, I doubt I’d consider paying for their content — I already am a New York Times digital subscriber. Not that I don’t think Politico’s content is worth paying for, but after spending $100 each month on my Droid Razr Maxx, $70 towards Dish, the New York Times, Amazon Prime and several podcasts, I would have a hard time adding a CNET, the Verge, SportsbyBrooks, Grandland, or Politico to that list — regardless of how much I enjoy those websites.

Huckabee uncertain about future of radio show, never stood a chance against Limbaugh

Mike Huckabee

On Thursday, Cumulus Media’s syndicated host Mike Huckabee celebrates the one year anniversary of his radio show. By this time next month, he may have already decided to quit.

Huckabee tells Arkansas Business he’s unsure whether he wants to continue doing his radio show, expressing concern about the amount of work required each day versus the potential for long-term profitability. Huckabee said he will decide in the next 30 days whether he wants to continue or not.

This certainly can’t be news Cumulus is pleased to hear, considering the amount of time and money invested in him. As I wrote yesterday, Huckabee has been reportedly penciled in to replace Premiere Radio’s syndicated host Rush Limbaugh on many of their news/talk stations throughout the country, including WLS-AM 890 in Chicago.  When anyone with a considerable amount of money and reach that Cumulus has hires someone with the intention of competing against Limbaugh, that requires a significant investment.  As tensions rise between Limbaugh and Cumulus, further hinting that Huckabee’s show is likely to gain many of Limbaugh’s remaining Cumulus affiliates — in markets that also include New York and Dallas — the timing of Huckabee’s limbo couldn’t be worse.

Stick a fork in him… he’s done. You don’t go on record of being non-commital towards such a project that is so incumbent on advertiser support, unless you already know that you are walking away. At this point, why would any news/talk station not owned by Cumulus ever consider adding his show to their lineup, especially when there are other alternatives out there?

Now, I doubt Cumulus Media CEO Lew Dickey is waking up this morning and finding out for the first time that his star radio host is non-committal. While I have grown to despise Dickey and his company, I don’t think they are that stupid. If they don’t already have a Huckabee backup plan in place, they are in the process of creating one at this moment.

In retrospect, I thought the hiring of Huckabee in that spot was an odd choice to begin with. At the time, Cumulus promoted him as being an alternative, less polarized choice for conservative talk radio. While I like the idea, Huckabee was a bad choice due to his bland personality. While he may barely cut it as a weekend cable television personality, the art of long-form talk radio quickly exposes that weakness.

From the get-go I wondered how much Hucakbee truly appreciated such an opportunity. While it’s not unheard of for someone in a completely different profession to embrace a career in talk radio, it certainly isn’t a given. Still, too many media companies fail to learn that more times than not, giving a radio show to a non-radio guy eventually backfires.

You can’t prepare and perform at the high level necessary for a sucessful talk radio show day after day without absolutely loving it — which is why so many college graduates take any opportunity they can while working for peanuts. And while Huckabee talks about the hope long-term profitability (again… support of the advertisers and increasing affiliates), it’s not like Cumulus wasn’t already paying him a pretty penny.

If the idea is to compete against Limbaugh, less partisan isn’t a bad idea, but you’ll still  need a larger than life personality.  If Bill O’Reilly couldn’t do it, Huckabee never stood a chance.

Knee-jerk reaction from Comcast SportsNet Chicago puts Susannah Collins out of a job

Susannah CollinsOn Tuesday night, Comcast SportsNet sideline reporter Susannah Collins was likely willing to laugh at her slip of the tongue statement in which she said on air that the Chicago Blackhawks had enjoyed a tremendous amount of sex. Just 48 hours later, any such laughing would come to an end.

The Chicago Tribune reports that Comcast SportsNet and Collins parted ways last night, due to increased attention focused on videos of when she co-hosted the more raunchier sports show “Sports Nutz.” According to the Tribune piece, the decision was made out of concern of journalism integrity. As Scott King at ChicagoNow wrote, her performance on “Sports Nutz” is what likely lead to her breaking out in the first place. King has further harsh criticism for the CSN Chicago decision, as does  Dead Spin which rightfully notes that the gig didn’t prevent the network from hiring her last summer.

670 The Score/WSCR-AM midday host Dan McNeil made mention on his show yesterday that Collins was scheduled to come on, but that the appearance was cancelled. It was speculated that CSN Chicago did not want continued focus on her Tuesday night gaffe.

So did CSN Chicago not thoroughly research their employee before hiring her? And how does that gig compromise the network’s journalism integrity? She was a beautiful sideline reporter, hired because of her sex appeal! I don’t see how her performance on “Sports Nutz” would compromise her ability to maintain integrity as a sideline reporter or as a fill-in anchor.